The Sickness Unto Death by Søren Kierkegaard
The Sickness Unto Death by Søren Kierkegaard

Philosophy · 1849

What is The Sickness Unto Death about?

by Søren Kierkegaard · 3h 40m

Open in Superbook

The short answer

The Sickness Unto Death, published in 1849 under the pseudonym Anti-Climacus, is Kierkegaard's most rigorous psychological and theological analysis of despair — which he defines not as an emotion but as a structural failure of selfhood. The title comes from the Gospel of John (the story of Lazarus), but Kierkegaard reinterprets the sickness unto death as despair: a condition from which there is no exit except through faith, and which can be fatal to the spirit even while the body survives.

The Sickness Unto Death by Søren Kierkegaard
The Sickness Unto Death by Søren Kierkegaard

Talk to The Sickness Unto Death like its author wrote you back.

Get the ideas that fit your life — not generic summaries.

  • Chat with the book
  • Audiobook-style main ideas
  • Adapts to your life and goals
  • Helps you take action
Open in Superbook

The Sickness Unto Death, in detail

The Sickness Unto Death, published in 1849 under the pseudonym Anti-Climacus, is Kierkegaard's most rigorous psychological and theological analysis of despair — which he defines not as an emotion but as a structural failure of selfhood. The title comes from the Gospel of John (the story of Lazarus), but Kierkegaard reinterprets the sickness unto death as despair: a condition from which there is no exit except through faith, and which can be fatal to the spirit even while the body survives.

The opening definition is one of the most demanding in the entire philosophical tradition: a human being is a synthesis of the infinite and the finite, the temporal and the eternal, freedom and necessity. The self is the relationship between these poles — not one of the poles but the relational activity itself. Despair arises when this relationship fails: when the self either loses itself in the finite (failing to become itself) or exhausts itself in abstraction from the finite (also failing to become itself). Both failures are forms of despair, and the person in either form is not at rest in the relationship that they are.

Kierkegaard identifies three intensifying forms of despair. The first is unconscious — the person does not even know they are in despair, which Kierkegaard considers the most common and most dangerous form. The second is conscious despair about something temporal — the refusal to accept a loss or failure. The third is defiance: the most intense form, in which the self, conscious of despair, refuses to be itself as it is constituted and instead wills to be itself on its own terms, independent of the power that establishes it. This last form is closest to sin in Kierkegaard's theological framework.

The second part of the book is explicitly theological: sin is defined as despair in the face of what one knows about God. The only exit from despair is faith — the condition in which the self rests transparently in the power that constitutes it. This is not intellectual assent to doctrine but a total orientation of the self, a rest in relation to God that ends the perpetual flight and misrelation. Kierkegaard does not claim this is easy, common, or comfortable, but insists it is the only genuine resolution of the human condition.

The big ideas

  1. 1.

    Despair is not an emotion but a structural failure of selfhood: the self failing to be what it is constituted to be, in relation to the power that establishes it.

  2. 2.

    A human being is a synthesis of infinite and finite, temporal and eternal, freedom and necessity; the self is the relational activity between these poles.

  3. 3.

    The most common and most dangerous form of despair is unconscious — the person does not know they are in despair and calls it contentment.

What it explores

Chat with The Sickness Unto Death

Ask questions. Adapt it to your life. Get answers based on your goals.

Download on the App Store