Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West, in detail
Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, published in 1970, is Dee Brown's account of the systematic dispossession of Native American peoples across the American West between 1860 and 1890. The book is organized chronologically and geographically, covering the Navajo Long Walk, the destruction of the Sioux, the Apache wars, the subjugation of the Cheyenne, and ending at the Wounded Knee Massacre of 1890. Brown draws extensively on U.S. government documents, treaty texts, and recorded speeches by Native leaders, allowing the official record of the United States to indict itself.
The book was a conscious intervention. When Brown published it, the dominant narrative of westward expansion was still framed largely as progress and settlement — a story told from the perspective of white Americans. Brown wanted to tell the same period from the perspective of the people who were being dispossessed, killed, and forced onto reservations. He largely succeeds by using primary sources: the speeches of Sitting Bull, Red Cloud, Chief Joseph, Geronimo, and others are reproduced at length and with evident care. These men appear not as romantic figures or exotic obstacles but as political leaders making difficult calculations in a collapsing world.
What the book documents, carefully and without dramatic embellishment, is a pattern: a treaty would be signed; valuable land or resources would be discovered on the ceded territory; the treaty would be renegotiated or simply ignored; the people who resisted would be labeled as hostile and subjected to military force; survivors would be moved to smaller and less desirable land; and the cycle would repeat. Brown shows this happening to different peoples at different times with enough consistency that it becomes impossible to attribute to circumstance or individual bad actors. It was policy.
The book ends with Wounded Knee and a quotation from a Sioux holy man. It does not offer redemption or resolution. By 1890 the organized military resistance of Plains and Southwestern peoples was over. The losses Brown documents — of land, life, sovereignty, and cultural continuity — were not recovered by the century's end. That unresolved ending is part of the book's argument: this is not a story that is over.
The big ideas
- 1.
The dispossession of Native Americans in the West was not a series of isolated conflicts but a systematic policy, repeated across different peoples and regions with consistent methods and goals.
- 2.
U.S. treaty obligations were routinely broken when new resource discoveries or political pressures made them inconvenient — a pattern so consistent it constitutes a de facto policy rather than a series of failures.
- 3.
Native American leaders were sophisticated political and military strategists, not romantic figures or primitive warriors — the book recovers their voices through extensive quotation from primary sources.