The Goldfinch, in detail
The Goldfinch begins with a bombing in a New York museum. Thirteen-year-old Theo Decker survives; his mother doesn't. In the confusion of the aftermath, Theo walks out of the rubble carrying a small seventeenth-century Dutch painting — Fabritius's Goldfinch — not quite knowing what he's done. From there the novel follows Theo across two decades and through several social worlds: a wealthy Park Avenue family who take him in; Las Vegas, where his alcoholic father reappears; New York again, where he takes up antiques restoration under the wing of Hobie; and eventually the criminal world that inevitably closes in around the painting he never gave back.
The Goldfinch is a novel about grief and about the way objects can carry what people leave behind. The painting is Theo's connection to his mother, and more broadly to the idea that some things survive destruction — that beauty persists through accident, through war, through the indifference of time. Tartt is an unapologetic classicist; the novel's debt to Dickens is everywhere, in its picaresque structure, its memorable gallery of secondary characters, the social worlds Theo passes through, the long reach of crime and coincidence in a plot that takes the whole novel to close.
Tartt writes physical reality with extraordinary pleasure — interiors, furniture, the look of drugs and alcohol, the texture of different social registers. The middle section in Las Vegas with Boris, Theo's anarchic Ukrainian friend, is the most kinetic part of the novel; the antiques world in New York is the most atmospheric. At nearly 300,000 words, The Goldfinch is long, and the final third, set partly in Amsterdam, moves from realist novel into something more like a thriller.
The Goldfinch won the Pulitzer Prize in 2014 and sold millions of copies. It was also the subject of a critical backlash from literary reviewers who found it sentimental, overlong, and unserious as a literary object. That debate is partly a proxy war about popular versus experimental fiction, and readers who loved it are often not interested in the argument. It's a big, absorbing, emotionally generous novel that asks you to care about a painting, a friendship, and a young man's survival, and it delivers on all three.
The big ideas
- 1.
The painting functions as the novel's organizing symbol and its moral problem simultaneously — Theo's attachment to it is genuine and explicable, and it also ruins him slowly.
- 2.
Tartt's Dickensian structure means the novel is openly invested in plot — coincidence, long-deferred consequence, characters reappearing — in a way that contemporary literary fiction often disdains.
- 3.
Grief is presented as something that doesn't resolve or heal cleanly — Theo carries his mother's death forward into every version of himself, and the painting is the physical form of that carrying.