Summary
Divine Rivals is set in a secondary world at war — not a war between nations but between gods, two ancient siblings who have woken after millennia and are using human armies as instruments of their conflict. Iris Winnow is a young journalist in the city of Oath, competing with the infuriating, well-connected Roman Kitt for a staff position at the Oath Gazette. She has been writing letters to her missing brother Emrys, posting them into her wardrobe, and discovering — late — that the letters are being answered, by someone on the other side who signs himself with a stranger's handwriting. The enemy-to-lovers dynamic and the epistolary conceit drive the romance; the war and its mythological frame drive the plot.
The world-building is deliberately shallow in the best sense — this is not a fantasy that requires a glossary. Ross has created a world that looks like inter-war Europe with divine intrusion, and the aesthetic choices (typewriters, newspapers, trench warfare) are doing a lot of the atmospheric work so the mythology doesn't have to. The divine conflict is suggestive rather than explained, which keeps the focus on the characters rather than the mechanics.
Ross writes with genuine feeling for her protagonists, and the correspondence between Iris and Roman — conducted in ignorance of each other's identity — has the pleasures of an epistolary novel: wit, longing, things said in writing that could never be said in person. The rivals-to-lovers structure is executed with patience. The competitive dynamic between them at the paper is fun. The war sections, when Iris gets to the front as a correspondent, are darker and more sobering than the romance plot alone would suggest.
This is a book that found a huge readership because it delivers on all the promises of its genre — the slow-burn romance, the atmospheric world, the mythological stakes — without demanding the density of high fantasy or the bleakness of grimdark. Readers who want more rigorous world-building, or who find the romantic mechanics of enemies-to-lovers formulaic, will find it light. Those who want an emotionally warm, atmospherically rich romantic fantasy that takes its wartime setting seriously enough to give the romance real stakes will find it very rewarding.
Key takeaways
- 1.
The epistolary conceit — letters exchanged in ignorance of identity — is one of the oldest devices in romantic literature, and Ross uses it with genuine skill.
- 2.
The inter-war European aesthetic (typewriters, trenches, newspapers) grounds the fantasy in emotional familiarity without requiring a fully built secondary world.
- 3.
The rival journalists dynamic is specifically about ambition in young people who are good at the same thing and know it. That rivalry is affectionate and competitive simultaneously.
- 4.
The gods' war is treated as a backdrop that gives human choices moral weight. The divine conflict is not resolved in this book — it functions to create conditions rather than provide answers.
- 5.
Iris going to the front as a war correspondent is the moment the novel shifts gears. The war sections are sobering and the romance feels more urgent because of them.
- 6.
Roman's backstory — his father's expectations, his own ambitions — complicates him in ways that elevate the romance above simple rivals-to-lovers.
- 7.
The novel is optimistic about journalism and the press, which is a conscious choice given the wartime setting and the divine manipulation of reality.
- 8.
The ending opens rather than resolves — this is the first of a duology, and the cliffhanger is genuinely earned rather than artificial.
Discussion questions
Use these on your own, with a book club, or as chat starters in Superbook.
- 1.
The letters are the emotional center of the novel. What does writing rather than speaking allow Iris and Roman to be with each other that they can't be in person?
- 2.
The divine war is conducted through human armies without most humans understanding what they're fighting for. Does that feel like a comment on real wars?
- 3.
Ross chose an inter-war European aesthetic rather than a traditional high-fantasy setting. What does that choice do to the emotional register of the story?
- 4.
Iris is defined partly by her missing brother. How does her search for Emrys shape who she is as a protagonist?
- 5.
The rivalry between Iris and Roman is professional and personal simultaneously. Did their dynamic at the Gazette feel believable as journalism?
- 6.
Roman's relationship with his father is one of the novel's darker subplots. Did you find his eventual choices convincing?
- 7.
The gods appear rarely and remain mysterious. Did that restraint feel right, or did you want more direct engagement with the divine conflict?
- 8.
The front sections when Iris becomes a war correspondent are tonally different from the newspaper sections. Did those shifts work, or did they feel like different books?
- 9.
The novel ends on a cliffhanger. Did you find that satisfying as a reading experience, or did you feel the structural demands of a duology distorting the story?
- 10.
Divine Rivals has had enormous success on BookTok and among young adult crossover readers. What is it offering that similar fantasy romances don't?
- 11.
Iris is motivated by her family — her brother, her mother. Is that motivation enough to carry a protagonist, or do you want something more for her as an individual?
- 12.
The romance takes a long time to resolve. Was the patience rewarded, or did you find the slow burn frustrating?
Themes
Frequently asked questions
-
Is Divine Rivals a standalone or part of a series?
It is the first book in the Letters of Enchantment duology. The second book, Ruthless Vows, concludes the story. The first book ends on a cliffhanger, so most readers go directly to the sequel. Reading both together is recommended.
-
Is this a young adult or adult novel?
It is published as adult fiction but has a large crossover young adult readership. The protagonists are young adults, the content is not graphic, and the emotional register is accessible to older teens. It is not grimdark or explicitly adult.
-
How much do I need to know about the fantasy world before starting?
Very little. Ross keeps the world-building accessible. There is no glossary required. The inter-war European aesthetic does most of the atmospheric work and you can orient yourself quickly.
-
Who shouldn't read this book?
Readers who want dense world-building, morally complex characters without easy resolution, or who find the enemies-to-lovers romance formula predictable rather than pleasurable will find it too light. This is romantic fantasy optimized for emotional satisfaction, not formal complexity.
-
Is the romance explicit?
No. The romantic content is minimal and entirely suitable for younger readers. The book's romance is almost entirely conducted through letters and longing rather than physical contact.