Book comparison

Atomic Habits vs Tiny Habits

Read Atomic Habits as the general manual, and Tiny Habits if you have already tried habit systems and stalled, because Fogg starts smaller and takes motivation dips more seriously.

Atomic Habits

James Clear

2018 · 5h 30m

Tiny Habits

BJ Fogg

2019 · 5h 0m

Where they agree

Both reject willpower as the engine, and both anchor a new behaviour to something you already do. Clear calls it habit stacking, Fogg calls it anchoring, and the formula is close to identical. Both insist the first version of a habit should be almost embarrassingly small, and both are written for people who have failed at this before.

Where they differ

Fogg is a Stanford behaviour researcher presenting his own model: a behaviour happens when motivation, ability and a prompt arrive together, so if a habit is not happening, one of the three is missing. His distinctive claim is emotional. He argues you wire a habit in by deliberately celebrating it in the moment, not by repetition alone. Clear synthesises a much wider range of sources into a broader toolkit and is the better-written book; Fogg is narrower, more repetitive and folksier, but sharper at diagnosing why one specific habit keeps failing.

Which to read first

Atomic Habits, which covers more ground and is easier to keep referring back to. Come to Tiny Habits second, when you know which habit is defeating you and need it broken down further than Clear breaks it.

Read Atomic Habits if

You want a broad system you can point at any area of your life, from training to money to reading.

Read the summary →

Read Tiny Habits if

You have tried the standard advice, it did not hold, and you want the smallest possible starting version plus a reason it failed.

Read the summary →

Common questions

Should I read Atomic Habits or Tiny Habits?

Read Atomic Habits as the general manual, and Tiny Habits if you have already tried habit systems and stalled, because Fogg starts smaller and takes motivation dips more seriously.

What is the difference between Atomic Habits and Tiny Habits?

Fogg is a Stanford behaviour researcher presenting his own model: a behaviour happens when motivation, ability and a prompt arrive together, so if a habit is not happening, one of the three is missing. His distinctive claim is emotional. He argues you wire a habit in by deliberately celebrating it in the moment, not by repetition alone. Clear synthesises a much wider range of sources into a broader toolkit and is the better-written book; Fogg is narrower, more repetitive and folksier, but sharper at diagnosing why one specific habit keeps failing.

Which should I read first, Atomic Habits or Tiny Habits?

Atomic Habits, which covers more ground and is easier to keep referring back to. Come to Tiny Habits second, when you know which habit is defeating you and need it broken down further than Clear breaks it.

More like these: books like Atomic Habits, books like Tiny Habits, or every comparison.

Try Superbook for free

Works with any book.

Download on the App Store